Example Wallet One review
Strong recovery, but a confusing approval screen. A sound choice for holders who want a hardware wallet, as long as they take extra care approving tokens.
Disclosure: we may earn a commission if you buy through a link marked “paid link”. This doesn’t affect the score, which we record before adding any links.
7.8 out of 10. Scored using our published method. Scores here are invented.
| Criterion | Weight | Score | What we found |
|---|---|---|---|
| Security design | 35% | 8 | Keys stayed on the device, and flaws were disclosed clearly. |
| Backup and recovery | 20% | 9 | We recovered test funds on a second device using the documented process. |
| Safe everyday use | 15% | 6 | The approval screen was harder to understand than the send screen. |
| Company record | 15% | 7 | Its response to a past incident was prompt and public. |
| Privacy and data | 15% | 8 | Setup needed little personal data. |
What we liked
- Clear recovery process
- Addresses are easy to check on the device
What to watch
- Token approvals are hard to read
What we tested
The review format covers setup, backup, send, receive, recovery and a firmware update using small test funds. A review can’t guarantee your safety, and we recheck products after major updates or incidents.
Buy Example Wallet One (paid link; goes nowhere in this prototype)